SoapZone Community Message Board

Subject:

I love... spoiler

From: chloe Find all posts by chloe Send private message to chloe
Date: Fri, 24-Jan-2025 11:55:01 AM PST
Where: SoapZone Community Message Board
In topic: Week of January 20th TV Post πŸ“ΊπŸ“Ί posted by Leia
In reply to: I hear ya. Literally the ONLY reason I'm still sticking around is..... posted by The_Cat_Did_It
John Grey!!!

Lord John Grey, who is too good for this stupid show. And too good to have to put up with Jamie and Claire and their endless bullshyte. This season made me HATE Jamie. I full on wish he had died when that ship sank. I'm beyond tired of Jamie and Claire both strutting around like they're King And Queen Of The World and everyone has to bow and scrape to them.

I don't hate Jamie, but the writing is all off - he would have ABSOLUTELY have forgiven him by now because he is USUALLY a very logical person.

The Faith story is stupid with a capital "S". I really hope it just ends up being someone who overheard Claire singing the song and liked it and remembered it. Because why would Master Raymond swap her baby with a dead one? It's stupid.

so, so dumb - and the worst part is that I've been waiting to see Sir Raymond, he's the ONLY ONE that I had a longing to see return.

Oh, I hate Jamie's stupid son, too. What an idiot. And I hate how they let the Jane storyline end. Talk about depressing.

I'm not a fan, either. I mean, i get the outbursts after finding out about Jamie, but he really spiraled a bit TOO MUCH.

I've also hated Roger for a long time. I find him so...useless.

oh, I like Roger. But i HATE Brianna. for all the reasons you stated and because she is always doing extremely stupid things. She's the Kim Bauer of Outlander.

Brianna is boring AF and the whole little smug, dodgy conversation with her grandfather? What was the point?

There was NO POINT. NO POINT AT ALL.

Also, what was the point of Roger's father time-traveling? I was mostly zoned but did he actually die as Roger had been told or did he just disappear in time and people thought him dead? Did Roger change his timeline by returning his dad to the future? But if Roger was not eventually raised by Reverend Wakefield then he never would've met Claire and Brianna. I was confused.

What was the POINT of Roger's father's time travel, I have no clue other than maybe they wanted to further establish that the time travel 'gene' runs in their family? Roger always thought his father died in a plane crash, but he found out his father was doing secret recon missions or something like that. Apparently in Outlander time travel, you don't change your past when you make changes IN your past. So Roger didn't all of the sudden get a bunch of memories of his dad or remember an alternate past.

There is less than a zero percent chance I'll watch the upcoming prequel because what's the point? We know it all ends in tragedy. Jamie's mom dies young and both of Claire's parents die when she's 5 so πŸ€·β€β™€οΈπŸ€·β€β™€οΈπŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

I'll watch it for the scenery and the hotties, LOL.


1 reply, 48 views
generated page in 0.007 seconds using 9 database requests (reply links were cached)